Electric cars should not be shared. At present, the generally accepted essence of shared bicycles is to spend money. Even if it is money, bicycles are easier to operate, and electric vehicles are troublesome. Imagine that you can achieve your goal by fooling with a successful force, why do you need to try your best to find trouble. Bicycle sharing is a connecting tool for buses and subways. It plays a role in making up for shortcomings in travel. Electric vehicles and public transportation have some conflicts of interest. There are conflicts between them. Of course, safety is also a big factor, including traffic accidents and battery line fires.

Recently, bike-sharing has been unprecedentedly destroyed on the one hand, but on the other hand, it has conducted another round of financing. As this divergence between market demand and investment heats has intensified, the market will eventually face adjustments, depending on who is the last one to take the pick. The life of a Didi taxi is incomplete. It proves the original intention of achieving profit-making purpose only by playing with fur signs under the condition of no scientific and technological innovation and no substantive and continuous convenience for the people. And any economic activities derived under this line of thought are routines.

At that time, the standard of electric vehicles was basically a bicycle concept, and according to this condition, no electric vehicles were allowed to be produced. However, such large-scale production of electric vehicles is a large-scale company, not some small works imitating small street factories. This kind of large-scale production and sales is regarded as a legal license, a legal purchase, and a legal use for consumers. Nowadays, I do n’t know if a leader patted his head, and said that these electric production and sales are not qualified. It is necessary to seize and easily deny the consumer ’s right to purchase and use property.